The term “Modi ka Parivar,” which literally translates to “Modi’s family,” was shared on social media by a number of individuals affiliated with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in response to the statement made by Lalu Yadav, which stated that “Modi does not have a family.”On Tuesday, the Congress party voiced their disapproval of the party’s ‘Modi ka Parivar’ campaign, which was held in New Delhi.
The Congress party posed a question to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of whether or not fugitive economic offenders like Nirav Modi and Vijaya Mallaya are also members of the family of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.Following the statement made by Lalu Yadav that Prime Minister Narendra Modi does not have a family, a number of figures within the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have appended the suffix “Modi ka Parivar” (which translates to “Modi’s family”) to their names on a variety of social networking sites.
You are able to obtain the most recent information from the Hindustan Times that is available on the move! Take a moment to read this.
A member of the Congress party named Pawan Khera has made an inquiry into whether or not Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) who is accused of sexual harassment, happens to be a member of Modi’s family.
He was asking, “Were not Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, Pawan Singh, Nirav Modi, and Vijay Mallya also Modi ka parivar?” Regarding the political personalities, he was making a reference.
Pawan Singh, a musician from Bhopal, decided to withdraw from the Lok Sabha elections one day after the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) declared that he would be the party’s candidate for the Asansol constituency in West Bengal. He made his choice as a result of allegations made by the Trinamool Congress, which is the political party that is now in power, that he had shown women in his music videos in an offensive manner.
Both Vijaya Mallya and Nirav Modi were able to evade Indian authorities and vanish abroad, despite the fact that they were both involved in illegal activities that violated economic laws.To add insult to injury, Lalu Yadav had branded to Narendra Modi as a “fake Hindu.” Tejashwi Yadav, earlier today, provided an explanation for his father’s statement by adding that he had his daughter tonsured in accordance with Hindu customs. However, Prime Minister Modi did not tonsure his daughter following the death of his mother.
We have a temple in our home, and we do Aarti every morning and evening after that. Our family is extremely devoted to the Hindu religion, and we have a temple in our home. Using the mundan (tonsure) ritual, I was able to convince my daughter to take part in the ceremony. He remarked that he is obligated to provide an explanation to the question of why the Prime Minister made the decision to not adhere to the long-standing custom rather than the custom.
In a statement that was released today, Prime Minister Narendra Modi voiced his disagreement with Lalu’s statement.
“When I argue against familism and point out that it is incompatible with democracy and does not allow room for the emergence of new talent, they remark that Modi does not have a family. I am correct in my assertions. If they are allowed to steal, what type of authorization do they have? I have seen chief ministers who have family members working in high-ranking positions in their home states. I have seen this happen.
Do we reside in a democratic society? As far as they are concerned, the philosophy of Modi is the object of their attack. According to certain reports, Modi does not have any family members. Is there a possible clash of ideologies in this situation? “I will explain to you what an ideological conflict is: they stress the importance of family, but Modi emphasizes the importance of nation,” said the politician.